MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004851133 · doi:10.2118/140149-ms

Effect of Lithology on the Flow of Chelating Agents in Porous Media during Matrix Acid Treatments

2011· article· en· W2004851133 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Mahmoud, H. A. Nasr‐El‐Din, C. A. De Wolf, A. K. Alex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production and Operations Symposium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
FundersAkzoNobel
KeywordsDolomiteCalciteDissolutionChelationChemistryMagnesiumCarbonateChemical engineeringMineralogyInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chelating agents such as GLDA, EDTA, and HEDTA have been used to stimulate calcite reservoirs as alternatives to HCl. HCl based stimulation fluids are very corrosive at high temperatures and should be loaded with many additives to reduce corrosion problems. In addition, the application of HCl can lead to face dissolution at low flow rates. GLDA chelating agent was used to stimulate calcium carbonate cores up to temperature of 300°F and at low rates without any face dissolution problems. The dissolution of dolomite by chelating agents has not been thoroughly investigated. Preliminary experiments with EDTA at ambient temperature revealed no significant dolomite dissolution. The dissolution mechanism is probably inhibited by the low stability of the magnesium chelate at that temperature. In this study, we will investigate the ability of GLDA (glutamic -N,N- diacetic acid) to stimulate dolomite cores as well as calcite cores. GLDA with different pH (1.7, 3 and 13) was used for this study. Dolomite and Indiana limestone cores with dimensions of 1.5 in. diameter, 6 and 20 in. length were used. The coreflood experiments were run at different flow rates and temperatures to determine the optimum rate at which GLDA solutions can create wormholes in both dolomite and calcite cores. Complete fluid analysis for the coreflood effluent was done to study the reaction of GLDA with both dolomite and calcite cores. GLDA was very effective in stimulating both dolomite and calcite cores at different pH levels over a wide range of temperatures (180, 250 and 300°F). There was no well defined optimum injection rate at which the amount of GLDA needed to create wormholes was minimum, instead a broad range of injection rates was found for which the amount of GLDA needed to breakthrough the core was minimum. Also, GLDA effectively chelated magnesium and calcium from dolomite cores. GLDA was stable up to temperatures of 300°F and the concentration of GLDA after the treatment was the same as that before the treatment, further confirming the thermal stability of GLDA at this temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it