MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004860315 · doi:10.1029/2009eo360003

Houston, We Have a Problem: Satellite Altimetry Skews Ocean Depths

2009· article· en· W2004860315 on OpenAlexaff
R Macnab

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetrySeabedSeafloor spreadingAltimeterDepth soundingGeologySatellite altimetrySatelliteOceanographyRemote sensingEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the decades after the space program began, several research missions produced global maps of ocean bathymetry. While these maps do an adequate job of portraying generally the seabed on a worldwide or even a regional basis, they fail to convey accurate and detailed pictures of seabed topography over more restricted areas when compared with renditions that can be obtained with multibeam sounding systems. As more and more laypeople come into contact with seafloor altimeter data through systems such as Google Maps TM , the public erroneously is starting to believe that all of the seafloor has been mapped in fine detail. To prevent this, ocean scientists must take active roles in petitioning those who fund science research that a broad campaign to survey the ocean floor through multibeam sounding systems is as critically needed as studies from space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207