MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004867801 · doi:10.1139/v04-108

Growth and morphological evolution of hexapod-shaped cuprous oxide microcrystals at room temperature

2004· article· en· W2004867801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper-based nanomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHexapodChemistryPerpendicularOxideMorphology (biology)Yield (engineering)IrradiationThermalPulmonary surfactantEutectic systemCrystallographyComposite materialMaterials scienceMicrostructureOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth and morphological evolution of hexapod-shaped Cu 2 O microcrystals is carefully studied via a γ-irradiation reduction route at room temperature and under ambient pressure. The products are examined by means of XRD patterns and FE-SEM images. The as-obtained hexapod-shaped Cu 2 O microcrystal is composed of six legs, whose adjacent legs are perpendicular to each other and each leg is composed of two perpendicular cross blades. A simple reaction system, excluding the influence of surfactant and thermal disturbance, would favor revelation of the inherent growth habit of Cu 2 O microcrystals under relatively mild experimental conditions. Furthermore, the effects of several factors on the final product and morphology are investigated.Key words: hexapod-shaped, γ-irradiation, cuprous oxide, morphological evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it