MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004876159 · doi:10.1063/1.4712342

Metastable phase formation in the Au-Si system via ultrafast nanocalorimetry

2012· article· en· W2004876159 on OpenAlexaff
Minhao Zhang, Jian Wen, Mikhail Y. Efremov, E. A. Olson, Z. S. Zhang, Ling Hu, Lito P. de la Rama, Ravi K. Kummamuru, K. L. Kavanagh, Zheng Ma, L. H. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupercoolingEutectic systemMaterials scienceMetastabilityMelting pointPhase (matter)Orthorhombic crystal systemMelting-point depressionCrystallographyPhase diagramAlloyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsMetallurgyChemistryCrystal structureComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have investigated the stability and solidification of nanometer size Au-Si droplets using an ultrafast heating/cooling nanocalorimetry and in situ growth techniques. The liquid can be supercooled to very low temperatures for both Au-rich (ΔT ∼ 95 K) and Si-rich (ΔT ∼ 220 K) samples. Solidification of a unique metastable phase δ1 is observed with a composition of 74 ± 4 at. % Au and a b-centered orthorhombic structure (a = 0.92, b = 0.72, and c = 1.35 nm; body-center in the a-c plane), which grows heteroepitaxially to Aus. Its melting temperature Tm is 305 ± 5 °C. There is competition during formation between the eutectic and δ1 phases but δ1 is the only metastable alloy observed. For small size droplets, both the δ1 and eutectic phases show considerable depression of the melting point (size-dependent melting).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207