MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004886333 · doi:10.1159/000136472

Effect of Prostaglandin-E <sub>2</sub> on Gastric Secretion and on Gastric Circulation of Totally Isolated ex vivo Canine Stomach

2008· article· en· W2004886333 on OpenAlexaff
K. Kowalewski, A. Kolodej

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoStomachCirculation (fluid dynamics)SecretionGastric secretionProstaglandin E2In vivoInternal medicineEndocrinologyProstaglandinChemistryMedicinePharmacologyBiologyIn vitroBiochemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Totally isolated canine stomachs, perfused with homologous blood, were used for the study of the effect of prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) on gastric secretion and circulation. Ex vivo stomachs were stimulated by a constant infusion of histamine into the gastric artery. When histamine-induced secretion was stabilized, PGE2 was introduced intra-arterially for 1 h. Doses of PGE2 tested were 500, 250 and 125 µg/h. After 1 h PGE2 infusion was interrupted, but histamine stimulation continued. PGE2 significantly inhibited the output of gastric juice, HCl and pepsin and reduced the concentration of HCl. The effect of PGE2 was still very marked after it was discontinued. PGE2 had a potent vasodilator action on gastric circulation: it reduced the gastric peripheral resistance and the gastric arterial perfusion pressure. This hemodynamic action of PGE2 was present only during infusion of the inhibitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207