MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004907558 · doi:10.1509/jimk.11.2.59.20166

Product Quality Orientation and Its Performance Implications in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

2003· article· en· W2004907558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Marketing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersPennsylvania State University
KeywordsDynamismBusinessQuality (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Market orientationSample (material)MarketingIndustrial organizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors model the performance implications of product quality orientation in Chinese state-owned enterprises and test the implications on a sample of 205 state-owned enterprises. The results show that product quality orientation has a positive impact on performance. This association is moderated by environmental uncertainty: The greater the perceived technological turbulence, the stronger is the relationship of product quality orientation to performance; the greater the perceived market dynamism, the weaker is the relationship. The results also show that the level of product quality orientation is lessened by perceived technological turbulence but enhanced by production routineness. Finally, state-owned enterprise performance is influenced inversely by perceived market dynamism but influenced positively by perceived technological turbulence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it