Analysis of CCN2 promoter activity in PANC-1 cells: regulation by ras/MEK/ERK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, CCN2) is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. We mapped the minimal CCN2 promoter active in PANC-1 cells, a human pancreatic cancer cell line. Within this region, Sp1, BCE-1 and Ets elements were important for the activity of the CCN2 promoter. Constitutive hyperactivated ras is a hallmark of cancers, including that of the pancreas. Treatment of PANC-1 cells with the MEK inhibitor U0126 or the Sp1 inhibitor mithramycin reduced CCN2 mRNA and promoter activity. Mutation of the BCE-1, but not Sp1 or Ets, site abolished the responsiveness of the CCN2 promoter to U0126. Overexpressing constitutively active MEK1 or ras activated CCN2 promoter activity. Thus CCN2 is likely to act downstream of ras in PANC-1 cells. CCN2 is overexpressed in cancer cells. Activated ras/MEK/ERK is a hallmark of cancer, and we have shown that the elevated CCN2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells is dependent on this pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".