MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004915895 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.822

Méditations sur l’éducation citoyenne

2011· article· fr· W2004915895 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Vincent Deslauriers

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Écrire est l’art qui donne à la politique de la substance. Nous sommes responsa­bles de nos écrits. Les lettres d’Olivier Verreault-Lefebvre et de Pierre-Louis Gosselin-Lavoie m’ont amené à réfléchir avec eux sur le sens des responsabilités, les relations de confiance et, au fondement de tout, sur l’éducation. L’école québécoise devrait offrir une éducation à l’exercice de la citoyenneté pour créer une société consciente, ouverte, cohé­rente, plus active et prête à mieux répartir les pouvoirs et la prise de décision collective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207