The entrainment envelope of dye-core vortices at submerged hydraulic intakes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each winter in Canada, operational difficulties are encountered at various water works resulting from intake blockages caused by frazil ice entrainment. In a lake setting, frazil is a surface phenomenon, the strong downward current produced by a swirling flow, with an intake vortex present, provides a mechanism by which frazil is transported from the water surface to the submerged intake below. Laboratory experiments were conducted to study the entrainment envelope associated with swirling and non-swirling flows into submerged water intakes. Three-dimensional velocity measurements were made with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. The results clearly show that the entrainment envelope for swirling flow is several times larger than that for non-swirling flow. This paper details, for a given set of conditions, the differences in the non-swirling and swirling flow entrainment envelopes and emphasizes the potential difficulties with frazil ice that vortices can cause at intakes.Key words: vortex, dye-core vortex, submerged hydraulic intake, entrainment envelope, three-dimensional velocity measurements, acoustic Doppler velocimeter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it