MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004936692 · doi:10.1002/er.1015

A study into the operation of an impact-type gas-solid separator

2004· article· en· W2004936692 on OpenAlexaff
J. P. Michel Hamelin, Prabir Basu, Feridun Hamdullahpur

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Energy Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeparator (oil production)FluidizationPressure dropBoiler (water heating)Fluidized bed combustionParticle sizeProcess engineeringWaste managementInletChemistryNuclear engineeringMechanicsMechanical engineeringPetroleum engineeringEngineeringFluidized bedChemical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas–solid separator, a key component of a circulating fluidized bed boiler, controls the recirculation of solids around this type of boiler. As the technology matures, the drive is to have smaller size units handling a greater amount of solids. The impact separator is well suited to meet these demands with a low pressure drop from operating at low gas velocities. Complex hydrodynamics are encountered in an impact separator, where a staggered array of collection elements separates solids from an incoming mixture of gas and solid particles. The research was to examine the performance of this separator experimentally in a scale model, built to provide benchmark data. At an inlet gas velocity of 4.0 m s−1, an overall collection efficiency of 87.5% of particles with a mean particle diameter of 125 µm was realized. The results were compared with those from a similar study. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Energy ResearchSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207