Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy combined with implantation of a single inferior intrastromal corneal ring segment and collagen crosslinking in keratoconus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) combined with implantation of a single inferior intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) and riboflavin with ultraviolet-A collagen crosslinking (CXL) performed sequentially on the same day in the management of keratoconus. SETTING: Cornea Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus having transepithelial PTK followed by femtosecond laser-enabled placement of a single inferior ICRS and CXL on the same day by the same surgeon between December 2010 and August 2011. The main outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), mean refraction spherical equivalent, keratometry (K), and total higher-order aberrations. RESULTS: Sixteen eyes of 13 patients were included in the study. Six months after same-day PTK combined with implantation of a single inferior ICRS and CXL, there was a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and the mean and steep K values. No patient lost CDVA lines. CONCLUSION: Phototherapeutic keratectomy combined with implantation of a single inferior ICRS and CXL on the same day was a safe, effective treatment for improving visual acuity in select patients with progressive keratoconus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".