MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004953907 · doi:10.5555/1400549.1400659

Development of the Virtual Flight Deck (VFD) simulation environment

2008· article· en· W2004953907 on OpenAlexaff
Kin Wing Tsui, Rob Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueSpring Simulation Multiconference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCockpitReal-time computingSimulationSoftwareReal-time simulationDeckEmbedded systemOperating systemEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the study of shipboard helicopter operations, simulations have been used in a variety of areas. Most of these simulations involve software implementation of mathematical models that run faster than real-time to produce meaningful results over a long span of time. When human operators or in-service hardware is brought into the simulation, however, the real-time requirement becomes a central issue. The Virtual Flight Deck - Real-Time (VFD-RT) simulation environment is built as an extension to previously-developed mathematical models to meet this real-time requirement. The VFD-RT uses a centralized model to connect the components of the simulation and relies on the Microsoft Windows message system as a means of communication between the different parts of the environment. This paper discusses the development and some limitations of the VFD-RT environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpring Simulation MulticonferenceSame topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207