MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004960576 · doi:10.1063/1.4892588

Change in entropy in thermal hysteresis of liquid-glass-liquid transition and consequences of violating the Clausius theorem

2014· article· en· W2004960576 on OpenAlexaff
E. Tombari, G. P. Johari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHysteresisThermodynamicsThermal hysteresisLiquid liquidEntropy (arrow of time)ThermalGlass transitionMaterials sciencePhysicsCondensed matter physicsStatistical physicsPhase transitionChemistryChromatographyPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Change in the entropy, dS, with change in the temperature T, with or without phase transformation, is determined only if the thermal path is reversible. For an irreversible thermal path, dS > dqirrev/T, an expression known as inequality in the Clausius theorem. In the glass formation range, Cp and enthalpy show a time-dependent hysteresis between the cooling and heating paths and the two Cp paths cross each other. We provide new data on Cp of poly(styrene) and use the previous Cp data [E. Tombari, C. Ferrari, G. Salvetti, and G. P. Johari, Phys. Rev. B 78, 144203 (2008)], both data obtained from measurements performed on cooling from melt to glass and heating from glass to melt at unusually slow rates, and show that violation of the Clausius theorem in such cases has insignificant consequences for determining the entropy of glass. We also report Cp of the samples annealed for different times at different temperatures in which the enthalpy spontaneously decreased. These measurements also show that violation of the Clausius theorem is relatively inconsequential for interpreting the entropy of the glassy state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207