MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004965178 · doi:10.1159/000076776

Effect of Aging on Visual Shape Distortion

2004· article· en· W2004965178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)PsychologyCognitive psychologyComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Individuals experience a visual illusion created by shape interaction: when two shapes are presented successively and briefly, the form of the second (test) shape appears distorted due to the form of the first (prime) shape; this shape interaction is called the shape distortion effect. While age-related deterioration in performance is found in various aspects of visual perception, the effect of aging on the shape distortion effect has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of aging on the shape distortion effect. METHODS: We measured the perception of briefly presented elementary shapes and of the shape distortion effect in 29 healthy volunteers, with ages ranging from 18 to 83 years. For each shape interaction trial, a prime rectangle was presented (vertical or horizontal) for 45 ms, followed by an interstimulus interval for 135 ms, a test circle for 60 ms and finally a random dot mask for 300 ms. The test circle was presented in each quadrant of the visual field. The prime rectangle was flashed either at the same position as the test circle (0 degrees offset, intrahemifield) or 11 degrees apart, displaced horizontally in the opposite hemifield (11 degrees offset, interhemifield). In the elementary-shape trials, there was no prime, and the test shape was a circle or an ellipse. Using the method of adjustment, the percent elongation [(longer diameter - shorter diameter)/(shorter diameter) x100] of the reproduced ellipse was computed. RESULTS: The mean percent elongation in response to the elementary shapes did not vary with increasing age. The shape distortion effect decreased significantly with increasing age during both intra- and interhemifield conditions. The mean shape distortion effect was larger for the intrahemifield condition than for the interhemifield one. CONCLUSION: The shape distortion effect decreases with advancing age while the perception of elementary shapes does not. These results indicate a severer age-related dysfunction of the cerebral processing of shape interaction than that of elementary-shape perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it