MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004972012 · doi:10.7202/201413ar

Le progrès en question. Beaugrand et Simon face aux États-Unis

2006· article· fr· W2004972012 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean-François Chassay

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis plus d'un siècle, les communications ont largement été associées à des machines servant aux transports des informations et des individus : train, voiture, mais aussi expansion des médias, du téléphone au téléviseur en passant par la radio, l'ordinateur et le développement des journaux. Si ces « »machines à communiquer" envahissent depuis longtemps la planète entière, elles ont toujours tenu une place particulièrement importante dans la formation et l'évolution de la société américaine. Cet article vise à montrer comment, à travers deux romans québécois (Jeanne la fileuse d'Honoré Beaugrand publié en 1878 et L'écrin disparu de Jean-François Simon publié en 1927), l'idée de progrès, liée au développement de ces machines (notamment du train et de la voiture), sert aux auteurs à se situer idéologiquement par rapport aux États-Unis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207