Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size I want to thank Mark Cauchi and Christopher Irwin for reading my review-essay and for providing me with critical comments on it.Notes1. When, in a single paragraph of my review-essay, I cite consecutively two or more passages from the same page of Hegel & the Infinite, the page number is given at the end of the last passage cited.2. An apt example of the constipated reading of Hegel, as found among those committed to postmodern deconstruction, and for which Žižek has his ready remedy, is provided by Roger W. H. Savage in his Hermeneutics and Music Criticism (New York: Routledge, 2010). Savage writes, for example, that in a composition like Erwartung Schoenberg gives us a sense “of suspenseful foreboding” by “shattering the Hegelian confidence in history and reason” (118). What Savage fails to see, however, is that, Hegel, like all our great modern thinkers and artists, constantly tests our confidence in history and reason by showing us that we have always to confront the “confidence man,” the con-artist who tests the confidence that we have in (our) history and reason. It is precisely faith (con-fidence) that gives rise to deception, to false confidence or security in history and reason. Still, in what can we truly have confidence if not in our history and our reason?3. Desmond acknowledges the importance of “the unconditional” in Kant (see 133). Yet, he claims that Kant does not see that the “unconditional is given before one’s freedom to determine oneself” (137). Surely, however, what Kant shows us is that, in willing unconditionally—in undertaking to treat all human beings as ends in themselves (as persons), not as means (things), in doing unto others what I want others to do unto me—the freedom of my self-determination is not prior to the unconditionality of the other. Rather, the freedom of my self-determination is constituted by the unconditionality of the other.4. We thus see why Buber understands the I-thou relation as the in-between and why Kierkegaard, in Works of Love, understands God as the “third” (partner) in the loving relationship between self and other: each of the two is the third but only in and through the other. Neither “possesses” or “masters” (the power/the weakness of) the third.5. It is a severe shortcoming of the essays in this collection that their authors, given that many of them, to their credit, do focus on Hegel’s philosophy of religion, do not make key doctrines of biblical ontology central to their discussion, above all, the doctrines of creation ex nihilo and of sin. Thus, they do not discuss the several commentaries that Hegel has on the story of the Fall, in which he writes that we find “the eternal mythus of man—in fact, the very transition by which he becomes man.” The Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree (New York: Dover, 1956), 321–22.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it