Improved drug dissolution and product characterization using a crescent-shaped spindle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drug release characteristics of two amoxicillin capsule products, 250 and 500 mg strength each, have been described using USP Paddle and crescent-shaped spindles. Using the same spindles, dissolution experiments were conducted with USP disintegrating (prednisone) and non-disintegrating (salicylic acid) calibrator tablets. Dissolution tests were conducted at 50 and 25 rev min(-1) using USP Paddle and crescent-shaped spindles, respectively. In all cases, even with the higher 50 rev min(-1), lower percent drug release results were observed with the Paddle spindle than with the crescent-shaped spindle, which was operated at 25 rev min(-1). The observed lower dissolution for amoxicillin capsule products (< 36 vs > 87% at 30 min) and USP prednisone calibrator tablets (45.5 vs 99.8% at 30 min) with Paddle spindles appeared to occur because of the accumulation of the disintegrated material (cone formation) at the bottom, thus restricting product-medium interaction. Crescent-shaped spindles did not allow any accumulation of the product and provided improved interaction by mixing and stirring, and thus appeared to provide true drug dissolution characteristics of the products. On the other hand, in the case of non-disintegrating USP salicylic acid tablets (18.5 vs 24.4% at 30 min), lower results with Paddle spindles appeared to be because of stagnation of the tablets, which provided poor product-medium interaction for the surface touching the vessel surface. In this case, the crescent-shaped spindles moved the tablets at the base of the vessel, providing improved and efficient product-medium interaction, thus appearing to reflect truer dissolution characteristics of the tablets. The results highlight the possible artifacts of the USP Paddle spindle, which could lead to inaccurate characterization of drug release properties of test products. As reported previously, the artifacts of high variability in results and lack of relevance to product properties appeared to be related to poor mixing and variable hydrodynamics within a dissolution vessel. Results from this study provide further evidence that these artifacts might be addressed adequately using the crescent-shaped spindle, thus resulting in improved drug release as well as better product characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".