Nanostructured Polymer Films with Liquid Inclusions. 2. Material Morphology and Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-layer core−shell latex particles with fluid cores were used for the preparation of a polymeric nanostructured material. The fluid cores were synthesized from the low glass transition temperature core-forming polymer (CFP) covalently labeled with a fluorescent dye. The CFP was encapsulated with a thin rigid shell of shell-forming polymer 1 (SFP-1). The second shell was synthesized from the shell-forming polymer 2 (SFP-2) on the surface of the bilayer particles. The specific relationship between the glass transition temperatures, T g 's, of the polymers incorporated into the core−shell particles was T g (CFP) < T g (SFP-2) < T g (SFP-1). Nanocomposite polymeric films were obtained following heat processing of the arrays of core−shell particles at annealing temperature, T g (SFP-2) < T ann < T g (SFP-1). The morphology of the nanostructured material was studied by examining the distribution of the fluorescent dye in the polymer film. Various factors providing sharp modulation in optical properties of the composite films were examined and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".