MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005028923 · doi:10.12968/bjca.2006.1.12.22453

Cardiac tamponade in the postoperative period following coronary artery bypass grafts

2006· article· en· W2005028923 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Thorn

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Cardiac Nursing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac tamponadeBypass graftingArteryAnginaCoronary care unitSurgeryIntensive care unitTamponadeCoronary artery bypass surgeryCardiac surgeryCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the care of a patient following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The patient developed a cardiac tamponade during the immediate postoperative phase. The patient was a 70-year-old gentleman who did not have any previous medical conditions and who was diagnosed with angina. He was admitted to the overnight intensive recovery unit following surgery. The care and management of this patient is discussed together with the clinical manifestations and treatment of cardiac tamponade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Cardiac NursingSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207