Exploration morphologique et sémantique des leitmotive communs à Tristan und Isolde et aux Wesendonck-Lieder de Richard Wagner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article tente de démontrer les relations souvent citées, mais rarement explicitées, entre Tristan und Isolde et les Wesendonck-Lieder de Wagner. Faisant appel au modèle sémiologique de Molino et Nattiez, l’auteur illustre la correspondance entre les œuvres en s’appuyant (1) sur une étude des origines de leur composition, (2) sur l’analyse littéraire des textes mis en musique, ainsi que (3) sur une analyse d’inspiration paradigmatique des motifs communs aux deux œuvres. Les liens entre les textes de Wagner et Mathilde Wesendonck, la musique du compositeur et la philosophie de Schopenhauer sont notamment explorés dans cet exercice de sémiotique appliquée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".