MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005056225 · doi:10.1680/geot.12.p.010

Numerical modelling of a field desiccation test

2013· article· en· W2005056225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéotechnique · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Properties and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesiccationNumerical modelsField (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringComputer simulationLaboratory testFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineeringGeologyEcologyMathematicsBiochemical engineeringSimulationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The numerical modelling of a field desiccation experiment carried out in Saint Alban, Canada is attempted. The progression of cracks during the course of desiccation and most material properties relevant to the modelling have been reported in detail in the published literature. The numerical model is based on the cohesive crack approach using a distinct-element program. The model seeks to replicate the crack pattern obtained in a linear section of the experiment. The development of the primary crack network is modelled successfully. The methodology shown in the paper can be used for numerical modelling of field desiccation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it