A Survey of In Situ Gas Evolution during High Voltage Formation in Li-Ion Pouch Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Li-ion pouch cells were made to study the factors that influence gas evolution during formation (first charge). Electrode materials, electrolyte additives and temperature were varied. Measurements were made using the Archimedes' In Situ Gas Analyzer at Dalhousie University. When cells are charged to high voltages (>4.2 V) there is gas evolution, presumed to be from reactions on the surface of the positive electrode. This is separate from the gas evolution known to happen at lower voltage (<3.5 V) caused by reactions on the negative electrode. Both evolutions were characterized by the magnitude of volume changes and their onset voltages. Gas volumes appear to increase and onset voltages decrease, respectively, with increasing temperature. Use of the additive prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone at 2% by weight in Li[Ni0.42Mn0.42Co0.16]O2/graphite cells yields smaller volume and higher onset voltage of gas evolution at all temperatures, compared to other additives tested. Certain cathode materials, namely some coated LiCoO2 samples, can be charged to high voltages (≤4.7 V) without producing gas at high voltage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".