Spermiogenic nuclear protein transitions and chromatin condensation. Proposal for an ancestral model of nuclear spermiogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have chosen three species (Sparus aurata, Dicentrarchus labrax, and Monodonta turbinata) that represent different transition patterns in the composition and structure of spermiogenic nuclei. The transition patterns of these species are representative of spermiogenesis in a large number of animal species. We analyze: (a) nuclear protein exchange; (b) chromatin condensation pattern; and (c) histone acetylation during spermiogenic development. In the simplest spermiogenesis histones and nucleosomes remain in mature sperm. Chromatin of spermatids is organized into 20 nm granules, simultaneous with a nuclear volume reduction. The granules coalesce in the final stage of spermiogenesis. Granular chromatin is correlated with acetylation of histones H3 and H4, whereas final coalescence is associated with histone deacetylation. We also studied two other spermiogenesis where a basic protein substitutes histones. Each species has a very different substituting protein. One has a typical protamine of 34 amino acids; the other has a sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBP) of 106 amino acids. In both, the structural transitions and histone acetylation pattern are similar: in early spermiogenesis chromatin is organized into 20 nm granules, and histones are significantly acetylated, while the nuclear volume decreases. Subsequently, acetylated histones are displaced by the protamine or SNBP. Histone substitution causes chromatin remodelling and additional reduction in nuclear volume. We analyze these three cases together with earlier works and propose that the formation of 20 nm granules containing acetylated H3 and H4 accomplishes the minimum functional requirement to be considered the most evolutionarily ancestral chromatin conformation preceding condensation in animal spermiogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".