MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Compliance with postoperative instructions: a telephone survey of 750 day surgery patients

2001· article· en· W2005153278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTelephone surveySedationAnesthesiaAlcoholCompliance (psychology)Patient complianceSurgeryEmergency medicineAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients undergoing day surgical procedures are given postoperative instructions not to drink alcohol, drive vehicles or make important decisions for 24 h. They are also advised to have a responsible adult stay with them at home overnight. Seven hundred and fifty patients were telephoned at 24 h postoperatively to determine their compliance with these instructions. Four per cent of patients drove vehicles, 1.8% consumed alcohol, while one patient made an important decision. A higher proportion of patients (5%) drove after general anaesthesia than regional anaesthesia or intravenous sedation (2.4%). The percentage of patients consuming alcohol was similar in both groups (1.8% vs. 1.9%). Four per cent of patients had no one staying with them overnight despite being accompanied out of the hospital. Patient compliance with instructions to not drink alcohol, drive or make important decisions may be improved by physician reinforcement of instructions and patient education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it