MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005230776 · doi:10.1556/aorient.60.2007.4.4

The real date of the Szeged manifesto

2007· article· en· W2005230776 on OpenAlexaff
Krystyna Łukasiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Orientalia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifestoEmperorTreatyHistoryClassicsAncient historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Szeged manifesto had not been issued on August 4, 1444 as is generally accepted based on the date of the document given by Długosz. It was produced a few days later and antedated in an effort to conceal the issuance of another document on August 4, namely the letter of confirmation by the king of the peace treaty with Turkey. The above conclusion is supported by the explanation of an error in the date of the letter of John VIII Palaiologos to the king of Hungary made during its translation from Greek into Latin. Because of its date July 30, 1444 quoted by Długosz it has been assumed that the letter must have arrived in Hungary after the decision to resume the crusade was already made. In fact, the emperor’s letter played a crucial role in the decision of the king and the Hungarians to break the peace and go to war against Turkey in September 1444.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OrientaliaSame topicHistorical and Cultural Studies of PolandFrench-language works237,207