MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005245069 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2011.2168970

Transmission-Line Metamaterials on a Skewed Lattice for Transformation Electromagnetics

2011· article· en· W2005245069 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Selvanayagam, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialElectromagneticsTransmission lineLattice (music)Electric power transmissionComputational electromagneticsPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsElectronic engineeringAcousticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsElectromagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a lattice of skewed transmission lines to implement a full effective material tensor. First we show, using transformation electromagnetics, how a skewed lattice will introduce off-diagonal components in the material tensor. We then show how this can be extended to a transmission-line network placed on a skewed lattice, using periodic analysis of a 2-D transmission-line network. We also show how to design a 2-D transmission-line unit cell to implement a full-material tensor for 2-D propagation. We confirm our results using full-wave simulation of a unit cell, as well as full-wave simulation of refraction in a transmission-line network between an isotropic effective medium and a anisotropic effective medium. Finally, we show how this idea can be extended to 3-D unit cells for transformation electromagnetics applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207