MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005268866 · doi:10.1002/fact.1007

Design of continuous‐monitoring device based on membrane extraction with sorbent interface and micro‐gas chromatograph

2001· article· en· W2005268866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueField Analytical Chemistry & Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane Separation and Gas Transport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorbentChromatographyExtraction (chemistry)AnalyteMembraneChemistryGas chromatographyAdsorptionMembrane technologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A device for the continuous monitoring of the volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in air by membrane extraction followed by sorbent concentration and gas chromatographic separation is discussed. The device samples headspace and makes automatic injections followed by rapid separation and quantification. The main components of the system include membrane module, microtrap, and transfer line. A membrane module, microtrap, and fan are mounted in a housing, together constituting a MESI (membrane‐extraction sorbent interface) sampling unit. A heated silicosteel capillary column was used as the transfer line, avoiding adsorption and condensation of analytes and performing separation of the analytes prior to detection. The device demonstrated potential for field monitoring of aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated compounds, and terpenoids. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 5: 69–74, 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it