Diastereoselective tandem reactions of substituted 3-sulfolenes with bis-vinyl ketones leading to highly functionalized bicyclic and tricyclic frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The base-promoted reaction of 3-sulfolene with bis-vinyl ketones was shown in earlier work to proceed through a γ-1,2 addition/anionic oxy-Cope cascade; a subsequent treatment with base induced a second γ-1,2 addition to provide a [3.3.0] bicyclic framework that our group then exploited in the design of rigidified enzyme inhibitors for influenza neuraminidase. Out of a desire to expand the range of structural archetypes accessible through these couplings (and hopefully access additional conformationally-constrained inhibitor platforms) we have revisited this methodology, this time using substituted starting reagents. We show that judicious choice of the newly added substituent can control the exclusive formation of one of four new structural types, each formed as a single diastereomer. These include bicyclo[3.2.1] sulfones and spiro[5.4] sulfones, as well as an expanded collection of our original bicyclo[3.3.0] sulfone scaffolds, this time incorporating adjacent quaternary centres or additional rings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".