MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005306631 · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-s1-p146

Climbing-fiber induced state transitions in cerebellar Purkinje cells are controlled by synaptic conductance changes

2010· article· en· W2005306631 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan D. T. Engbers, Hamish W Mehaffey, Fernando R. Fernandez, Ray W. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neuroscience · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcitatory postsynaptic potentialPurkinje cellNeuroscienceBistabilityTonic (physiology)Parallel fiberPhysicsClimbing fiberSawtooth waveInhibitory postsynaptic potentialBiophysicsComputer scienceCerebellumBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purkinje cells have been previously modeled as a systemundergoing a saddle-node bifurcation of fixed pointsfrom rest to firing and a saddle homoclinic orbit bifur-cation from firing to rest. In vitro, this dynamical struc-ture is a result of the neuron’s intrinsic membraneproperties and is associated with bistability within a lim-ited range of low firing frequencies, where a unidirec-tional climbing fiber (CF) input is able to toggle the cellbetween a firing (“up”)andrest(“down”)state.Weidentified several factors that contribute to bistabilityand the ability for a unidirectional input (CF) to togglecell output, including a slow K+ current activated duringspike discharge or followingsynaptic depolarizations.However, input conditions that determine the probabil-ity for a Purkinje cell to express bistabilityin vivo havenot been determined. A key difference in vivo is the pre-sence of tonic background input to the dendrites fromparallel fiber (PF) and stellate cell inputs. We tested thehypothesis that dendritic inputs control the dynamics ofPurkinje cell firing, and can thus regulate the ability forCFs to induce toggling of Purkinje cell output.Presentation of mixed excitatory and inhibitory dendri-tic current noise (I-noise) or conductance noise (g-noise)to a two-compartment 5-equation model of the Purkinjeneuron had differing effects on spike output. Mixed I-noise increased the probability of observing CF-evokedtransitions to a down state whether the model was in thelow frequency-bistable regime or not. The size and timecourse of the currents associated with different statetransitions suggested that properly timed PF and/or stel-late cell inputs could affect the ability for CFs to invokePurkinje cell transitions. However, conductance noiseprevented any CF-evoked transitions and the model washighly sensitive to the E:I ratio. Spike trains with physio-logical mean frequencies and high coefficient of variation(CV) were also found. Spike triggered averages duringg-noise revealed that the spikes were being driven bysynaptic inputs and not intrinsic dynamics, indicating ashift in computational properties between high and lowconductance states.ConclusionsHere we show that bistabilityinaPurkinjeneuroncanbe controlled by the amount of synaptic input itreceives. Of the two types of noise we used, I-noisecould cause spontaneous state transitions, but g-noisecould not, suggesting that CF-associated toggling wouldnot occur in high conductance states. These resultscould explain the discrepancy between in vivo and in vitrorecordings regarding CF-induced state transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeuroscienceSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207