MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W200535769

Impact of abolishment of mandatory retirement on BC employment income

2011· article· en· W200535769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olga Strizhkova

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabour economicsEconomicsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amendments to the provincial Human Rights Code effectively abolished mandatory retirement in BC in 2008. Additionally, the Canadian population is aging. The seniors, 65 years of age or older, constitute the fastest growing population group. These facts are expected to have an impact on the insurance and pension industry as well as on social programs. In this project, we study the total employment income in BC. The total income in BC is projected, first, using pre-legislation retirement rates and secondly, using post-legislation retirement rates that are based on a survey of Canadian workers. The workforce is projected using a two-decrement model, with death and retirement as the two causes of decrement. Average annual salaries by age are then applied to the projected workforces to get the total income in BC. Prediction intervals are calculated and sensitivity analysis is performed for some of the key assumptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207