L’ironie contre la sagesse de la petite servante thrace : analyse d’un débat entre Jean Larose et Jacques Pelletier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La polémique qui opposa Jacques Pelletier (Les habits neufs de la droite culturelle) et Jean Larose (La souveraineté rampante) en 1994 révèle un « dialogue de sourds » (Marc Angenot) sur la définition et le rôle de la culture. Elle départage deux visions du monde : l’une, à laquelle se rattache Jean Larose, est romanesque et ironique, tandis que la seconde, qui subsume les idées de Jacques Pelletier, est rivée au concret, se veut sérieuse. La vision romanesque de la culture et du monde permet aussi de mieux comprendre la pensée d’une importante famille intellectuelle québécoise, groupée autour de la revue Liberté (surtout au cours des années 1980) et des Éditions du Boréal (surtout de la collection « Papiers collés »).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".