MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005367688 · doi:10.1542/gr.12-6-72

Outcome Analysis for Retractile Testes

2004· article· en· W2005367688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAAP Grand Rounds · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIconScrotumGeneral surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Source: La Scala GC, Ein S. Retractile testes: an outcome analysis on 150 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:1014–1017.This report from the University of Geneva, Switzerland, and Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children details the outcome of a series of 150 consecutive patients with retractile testes referred by primary care physicians to a single surgeon between April 1982 and April 1999. Data was collected prospectively regarding testicle position, size (normal, smaller than the opposite testis, or atrophic), presence of accompanying hernia-hydrocele, and family history of retractile testis. In addition, the surgeon noted the degree of spermatic cord tension or the amount of tug necessary to bring the testis into the mid-scrotum: normal or no tension, mild or minimal tension, moderate tension which may cause some discomfort, or true undescended testis. Orchidopexy was performed if a retractile testis ascended and became cryptorchid (34 patients) or if testicular size decreased during the follow-up period (3 patients). Follow-up duration averaged 3.8 ± 3.0 years. At the end of follow-up, the author recorded testicle size and one of the following outcomes: 1) descended to normal position; 2) testis brought to dependent position without retraction; 3) mild residual cord tension; 4) moderate residual cord tension; or 5) patient required orchidopexy for retractile testis that evolved to true undescended type.Median age at presentation was 4.7 years. No information on ethnicity was reported. Neither family history of retractile testis (positive in 8 [5.3%]), age at presentation, nor duration of follow-up was associated with a need for orchidopexy. Inguinal hernias occurred in 14.2% of right and 17.4% of left retractile testes. Orchidopexy was required more frequently in patients who had an inguinal hernia than in those who did not (68.8% vs 9.2%, P<.001). The authors conclude that the majority of patients presenting with retractile testis have spontaneous evolution to a dependent position after age 14 with no surgical intervention. However, they note that no conclusions could be drawn regarding final adult testicle size or function.Between 4.5 and 13 per 1000 school-age males have retractile testes, and many are referred to a pediatric surgeon mislabeled as having an undescended testicle.1–3 A retractile testis is usually defined as a testis that has completed the descent process but remains in the dependent scrotal position because of a hyperactive cremasteric reflex. The testis can be brought into the scrotum, but when traction is released, the testis will slide back into its accustomed position (usually adjacent to the external ring or just in the inguinal canal). In making the distinction between an undescended testis and a retractile one, there are several useful historical features. Parents can be asked whether the testis appears when the child has been in a warm bath for several minutes, and whether it quickly recedes after the child is removed from the bath. Other questions center around whether either parent noted symmetry of the testes or scrotal symmetry when changing diapers early in infancy. An older child may actually complain of vague groin pain associated with the hyperactive cremasteric muscle and its constant contraction.The testicular exam is crucial. Many pediatric surgeons feel that the physician should be able to gently coax the testis into the scrotum with little difficulty and no discomfort. It should remain in the scrotum for a brief period of time as long as the room and the surgeon’s hands are not cold. If the child is frightened about the exam, a later visit is in order before labeling his testis as undescended or retractile. However, if the testis in question springs back into the inguinal canal and can be pulled into the scrotum only with significant discomfort, that testis will likely require orchidopexy. A markedly asymmetric scrotum with a relatively flat hemi-scrotum on the side of the suspect testis indicates a patient in whom the testis rarely, if ever, visits that scrotal space—a sign of an undescended testis. Finally, the pediatric surgeon should be mindful of the retractile testis seen in conjunction with a surgical referral for a hernia on the same side. The retractile testis must be addressed at the time of the hernia repair and is usually secured in some fashion; otherwise, an iatrogenic undescended testis may result.The bottom line seems to us to be that a patient with retractile testis requires follow-up until the testis is definitively secured in the scrotum. The authors’ series demonstrates that almost one-fourth of their patients with retractile testes required surgery because the testes became cryptorchid or decreased in size. The authors note that treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is ineffective in treatment of cryptorchid testes,4,5 and do not encourage its use in retractile testes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAP Grand RoundsSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207