Interphase Boundary Precipitation of VC Accompanying Ferrite and Pearlite Transformation in Medium Carbon Steels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demands for medium carbon steels with high strength used for forging parts in automobile have been increasing. V addition to such steels leads to interphase boundary precipitation (IBP) of VC and thus an increase of strength. However, mechanism and strengthening effect of IBP have not been clarified in detail. In this study, precipitation of VC accompanying ferrite and pearlite transformations and its effect on hardness have been examined in medium carbon steels microalloyed with 0.3%V. Specimens transformed in a temperature range between 873 and 973K consist of pearlite and small amount of proeutectoid ferrite. Hardness increase by the V addition becomes larger by lowering transformation temperature at these temperatures. Meanwhile the alloying effect of V on the hardness remarkably decreases at 823K where bainite transformation takes place partly. TEM characterization has revealed that VC are precipitated in both of proeutectoid and pearlitic ferrites in the manner of fine rows parallel to the austenite / ferrite interphase boundary. The size of VC decreases and its number density increases by lowering transformation temperature, corresponding to the larger hardness increase. Orientation relationship analyses between ferrite and austenite in the V-added specimen based of EBSD measurements reveals that proeutectoid ferrite grows preferentially towards an austenite grain with which ferrite does not hold a specific orientation relationship, indicating that classical ledge mechanism does not play a role for interphase boundary precipitation of VC in this alloy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it