MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Control of pH alters the type of cross-linking produced by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC) treatment of acellular matrix vascular grafts

2001· article· en· W2005380515 on OpenAlexaff
Paul F. Gratzer, J. Michael Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbodiimideGlutaraldehydeMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringChemistryNuclear chemistryPolymer chemistryChromatographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbodiimide cross-linking of bioprosthetic materials has been shown to provide tissue stabilization equivalent to that of glutaraldehyde cross-linking, but without the risk of the release of unreacted or depolymerized cytotoxic reagent after implantation. In this study, the effects of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC) treatment on acellularized ovine carotid arteries were studied under two different pH conditions: (i) pH controlled at an optimal value of 5.5; and (ii) a simpler, but industrially significant, uncontrolled pH system. A multimode approach was employed involving biochemical assays, thermomechanical, tensile, and shear mechanical testing, and in vitro enzyme degradation analyses. EDC treatment decreased the hoop tangent modulus of acellular matrix (ACM) arterial grafts measured at 20 kPa of stress regardless of pH control. Extensibility of ACM arterial grafts measured at 20 kPa of stress was reduced after EDC treatment with pH control only. In contrast, shear stiffness of ACM arterial grafts increased to a greater degree under cross-linking without pH control (21 x compared to 14 x with pH control). Thermomechanical analyses revealed that EDC cross-linking with pH control also increased the collagen denaturation temperature of ACM arteries to a greater degree (a rise of 24.3 +/- 0.6 degrees C vs. 21.7 +/- 0.7 degrees C for no pH control), whereas cross-linking without pH control consumed a larger amount of lysine residues after 3 h of treatment. Most interestingly, both EDC treatments were equally effective in stabilizing ACM arteries against multiple degradative enzymes in vitro. The observed differences between EDC treatments under different pH conditions are attributed to differences in the location and types of the exogenous cross-links formed. The absence of pH control may have favored the formation of interfibrillar or intermolecular cross-links in collagen as well as involvement of other extracellular matrix components (proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans). Furthermore, it may be emphasized that the location or type of cross-links differentially affected the mechanical behavior of treated materials without affecting the increase in resistance to enzymatic degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials ResearchSame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207