MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005395945 · doi:10.1063/1.1899242

Near- and far-infrared p-GaAs dual-band detector

2005· article· en· W2005395945 on OpenAlexaff
Gamini Ariyawansa, M. B. M. Rinzan, D. G. Esaev, S. G. Matsik, Gary Hastings, A. G. U. Perera, H. C. Liu, Б. Н. Звонков, V. I. Gavrilenko

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomojunctionResponsivityOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceDetectorInfrared detectorDopingGallium arsenideInfraredPhotodetectorOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dual-band homojunction interfacial workfunction internal photoemission infrared detector that responds in both near- and far-infrared (NIR and FIR) regions is reported. In the p+-i-p+ detector structure, the emitter is carbon doped to 1.5×1019cm−3, and a 1μm thick GaAs layer acts as the barrier, followed by another highly p-doped GaAs contact layer. The NIR response is due to the interband transition in GaAs barrier layer and the threshold wavelength observed at 0.82μm is in good agreement with the 1.51eV band gap of GaAs at 4.2K. The intraband transition giving rise to FIR response is observed up to 70μm. Interband responsivity was (under 100mV reverse bias at 20K) ∼8A∕W at 0.8μm, while the intraband responsivity was ∼7A∕W. The detector has peak detectivities D*∼6×109 and 5×109cmHz1∕2∕W at 0.8 and 57μm wavelengths, respectively, under 100mV reverse bias at 20K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207