Reaction of [P<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>]TaCH<sub>2</sub>(Me) with Ethylene: Synthesis of [P<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>]Ta(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)Et, a Neutral Species with a β-Agostic Ethyl Group in Equilibrium with an α-Agostic Ethyl Group ([P<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>] = PhP(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>2</sub>NSiMe<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>PPh)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photolysis of [P(2)N(2)]TaMe(3) ([P(2)N(2)] = PhP(CH(2)SiMe(2)NSiMe(2)CH(2))(2)PPh) produces [P(2)N(2)]Ta=CH(2)(Me) as the major product. The thermally unstable methylidene complex decomposes in solution in the absence of trapping agents to unidentified products. However, in the presence of ethylene [P(2)N(2)]Ta=CH(2)(Me) is slowly converted to [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Et, with [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Me observed as a minor product. A mechanistic study suggests that the formation of [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Et results from the trapping of [P(2)N(2)]TaEt, formed by the migratory insertion of the methylene moiety into the tantalum-methyl bond. The minor product, [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Me, forms from the decomposition of a tantalacyclobutane resulting from the addition of ethylene to [P(2)N(2)]Ta=CH(2)(Me) and is accompanied by the production of an equivalent of propylene. Pure [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Et can be synthesized by hydrogenation of [P(2)N(2)]TaMe(3) in the presence of PMe(3), followed by the reaction of ethylene with the resulting trihydride. Crystallographic and NMR data indicate the presence of a beta-agostic interaction between the ethyl group and tantalum center in [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Et. Partially deuterated analogues of [P(2)N(2)]Ta(C(2)H(4))Et show a large isotopic perturbation of resonance for both the beta-protons and the alpha-protons of the ethyl group, indicative of an equilibrium between a beta-agostic and an alpha-agostic interaction for the ethyl group in solution. An EXSY spectrum demonstrates that an additional fluxional process occurs that exchanges all of the (1)H environments of the ethyl and ethylene ligands. The mechanism of this exchange is believed to involve the direct transfer of the beta-agostic hydrogen atom from the ethyl group to the ethylene ligand, via the so-called beta-hydrogen transfer process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".