Characterization of the Deposition of Organic Molecules at the Surface of Gold by the Electrochemical Reduction of Aryldiazonium Cations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deposition of 4-X phenyl groups (X = NO2, COOH, N-(C2H5)2) on polycrystalline gold electrode was achieved by the electrochemical reduction of the corresponding 4-substituted phenyldiazonium tetrafluoroborate salts in anhydrous acetonitrile media. The electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance measurements evidenced a two-step deposition process: the first one is the deposition of close to a monolayer and the second one is the relatively slower growth of multilayers. In this second region, the deposition is less efficient than for the first one. The electrochemical behavior of the resulting modified gold electrode was investigated in the presence of an electroactive redox probe and these results, together with the electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance data, demonstrated significant differences in reactivity and in deposition efficiency between the diazonium salts. The characterization of the modified electrodes by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, showed that the formation of multilayers is possible and that a significant fraction of the deposited material remained at the electrode surface, even following ultrasonic treatment. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data indicate that the existence of Au-C and Au-N=N-C linkages (where C represents a carbon atom of the phenyl group) is uncertain. Nonetheless, the deposition of the aryl groups by electrochemical reduction of diazonium cations yielded a film that adheres well to the gold surface and the deposited organic film hindered gold oxides formation in acidic medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".