Resistive Home Exercise in Patients with Recent-onset Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis — A Randomized Controlled Single-blinded Study with a 2-year Followup
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of resistive home exercise and its possible longterm influence on health, disability, and disease activity in patients with active polymyositis (PM) or dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS: Nineteen patients with recent-onset PM/DM were included after introduction of high-dose prednisolone. They were assessed by independent assessors as to perceived health, muscle performance, aerobic capacity, and serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) at baseline and after 24 weeks, including repeated muscle biopsies at 24 weeks (single-blinded randomized controlled study), and in an open-label followup at 52, 78, and 104 weeks. Patients were randomized to 12 weeks, 5 days/week resistive home exercise with telephone support and encouragement for another 12 weeks of twice-a-week home or gym exercise (EG, n = 10) or to 24 weeks, 5 days/week range of motion exercise (CG, n = 9). Patients in the CG group without inflammatory infiltrates in muscle biopsies at 24 weeks were invited to the 12-week resistive home exercises. RESULTS: At baseline, the EG had poorer perceived health, but otherwise the groups were comparable. At 24 weeks, both groups improved in muscle performance and aerobic capacity (p < 0.001 to < 0.05) with no signs of increased inflammation assessed by CPK levels or muscle biopsies. Both groups improved in muscle performance and aerobic capacity up to 52 weeks (p < 0.05) lasting to 104 weeks in the EG (p < 0.05) and presented minor improvements in perceived health. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the safety of resistive exercise in patients with active PM/DM but did not reveal any between-group differences in exercise effects. An individually adapted physical therapist-supervised home exercise program might be recommended in early active PM/DM, with regular evaluation of muscle performance and health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".