MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005470369 · doi:10.1179/175834909x399373

Sunday School Libraries in Halifax and Huddersfield before Public Libraries

2009· article· en· W2005470369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary & Information History · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Library scienceHistoryInstitutionNonconformistSociologyMedia studiesClassicsLawPolitical sciencePoliticsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before the end of the nineteenth century, when municipal public libraries were beginning to proliferate all over the country, working-class children had few outlets from where to borrow educational books. Sunday school libraries, which rapidly increased from the 1820s, helped to fill that gap. Sunday schools, which were established by Anglican and Nonconformist churches and chapels alike, brought elementary education to many children, and their libraries provided useful books, though often of a religious or moral nature. This study considers the area covered by the parishes of Halifax and Huddersfield in Yorkshire, which had one of the highest concentrations of Sunday schools. This article has been compiled, and inevitably reduced, from material contained in the author's unpublished Ph.D. thesis, A history of libraries in Halifax and Huddersfield from the mid-sixteenth century to the coming of the public libraries (University of London, 2003). Sadly, the author died only a few months after the thesis had been accepted and the degree conferred. She was Librarian of the Princess Alexandra College of Nursing, London. The editor of this article is grateful to Linda Parr's mother for permission to draw on the thesis, and to her supervisor, Dr Elizabeth Danbury, formerly of University College, London, for her co-operation. The author previously published two articles related to the theme of the thesis: 'The library of Halifax Mechanics' Institution 1825–1857', Library History 7 (1987), 177–186, and 'Ye olde Luddenden Library, c1776–1917', Transactions of the Halifax Antiquarian Society new ser. 11 (2003) 82–97.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.083
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it