The Contribution of Extramedullary Hematopoiesis to Hepatomegaly in Anemic Hydrops Fetalis: A Study in Alpha-Thalassemia Hydrops Fetalis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Massive hepatomegaly is a common finding in hydrops fetalis (HF) arising from hemoglobinopathies. It has been suggested that extramedullary hematopoiesis, which is markedly increased in response to anemia, plays a principal role in hepatomegaly via sinusoidal obstruction and distortion of the intrahepatic architecture. To test this concept, the authors compared 20 cases of α-thalassemia (hemoglobin Bart, 15 cases; hemoglobin H, 5 cases) with 19 cases of HF arising from other causes and 39 control nonhydrops cases. The mean liver weight in α-thalassemia cases was significantly heavier than in control cases and in hydrops fetalis cases due to other causes (P < 0.01). This was not explainable on the basis of extramedullary hematopoiesis (erythropoiesis or myelopoiesis) or hemosiderin deposition, since cases of HF from other causes, especially related to anemia, showed similar findings to α-thalassemia cases. While these processes no doubt contribute to hepatic weight, the major factor would still be high-output cardiac failure causing hepatic congestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".