MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005525568 · doi:10.1115/ipc2002-27121

Buried SAGD Flow Lines

2002· article· en· W2005525568 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lance N. Thomas, Rick A. Marsden

Bibliographic record

Venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipingSteam-assisted gravity drainageContext (archaeology)Pipeline (software)Pipeline transportPetroleum engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringOil sandsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EnCana Resources is enjoying economic success at their Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) research facility at Senlac, Saskatchewan. This has been achieved largely due to the successful application of new and innovative ideas and technologies. During the summer of 2001, PanCanadian Energy (now EnCana Resources) made use of a novel buried piping technology at the Senlac Thermal Project to solve the problem of connecting distant well pairs to the processing plant. The four-kilometer pipeline system accommodated a thermal growth of approximately 12 meters over its entire length using buried expansion loops and “Z” bends. The pipeline was installed at an estimated 30% cost savings over conventional above ground methods. This paper summarizes the successful installation of this unique piping technology at Senlac and its applicability to future commercial SAGD projects in the context of the heavy oil reserves in Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and BSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207