MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005529139 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/86/36005

Observation of the complete rupture of a buried polymer layer by off-specular neutron reflectometry

2009· article· en· W2005529139 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. P. de Silva, Simon J. Martin, R. Cubitt, Mark Geoghegan

Bibliographic record

VenueEurophysics Letters (EPL) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpecular reflectionNeutron reflectometryReflectometryMaterials scienceSurface finishOpticsScatteringLayer (electronics)X-ray reflectivityReflection (computer programming)NeutronNeutron scatteringComposite materialReflectivityPhysicsSmall-angle neutron scattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have used off-specular neutron reflectometry to study the rupture of a thin, deuterated polystyrene layer confined between a silicon substrate and a thick poly(methyl methacrylate) upper layer. After total rupture of the buried layer, the resulting roughness at the interface that controls the total reflection edge gives rise to Yoneda off-specular scattering. This hypothesis is confirmed by specular reflectivity data that can be fitted to an effective error function subsequent to the rupture of the buried layer. The observed increase in the Yoneda peak intensities, integrated along the path of constant momentum transfer q z , can be directly related to the formation of an interdigitated structure upon rupture of the buried layer. A distorted-wave Born approximation is used to quantitatively simulate the form of the off-specular data in terms of an equivalent error function, with fitting parameters in good agreement with the physical properties of the samples and key experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurophysics Letters (EPL)Same topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207