MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005541578 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.642595x

Adsorption of Free Lead (Pb <sup>2+</sup> ) by Pedogenic Oxides, Ferrihydrite, and Leaf Compost

2000· article· en· W2005541578 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Sauvé, Carmen Enid Mart ı ́ nez, Murray B. McBride, William H. Hendershot

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerrihydriteAdsorptionPedogenesisCompostChemistryAqueous solutionEnvironmental chemistryInorganic chemistrySoil waterSoil scienceGeologyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron oxides and organic matter have a high capacity to adsorb Pb and concomitantly maintain a low free Pb 2+ activity in solution. It is, therefore, important to assess the adsorption capacity of naturally occurring materials and evaluate their potential to reduce toxicity. The free Pb 2+ activity was measured in the solution in equilibrium with ferrihydrite (a synthetic Fe oxide), two field‐collected pedogenic amorphous oxides, and leaf compost. The experiment used a factorial design varying total Pb loading and solution pH. The results show that ferrihydrite was more efficient in lowering Pb aqueous concentration than the two pedogenic oxides. Furthermore, of the two pedogenic oxides examined, a higher Pb 2+ activity was maintained in solution at equilibrium with the most crystalline phase, which also has a lower surface area relative to the other adsorbents. Leaf compost maintained a significantly higher free Pb 2+ activity, relative to the various oxides. The experimental data could be fitted to a semi‐mechanistic model predicting free Pb 2+ activity as a function of total Pb loadings and pH, with R 2 varying from 0.77 to 0.92.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations138
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207