MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005558720 · doi:10.1080/15257770701527794

Introduction of Chirality into PNA By Replacement of the Achiral Methylene Carbonyl Linkage to the Nucleobase

2007· article· en· W2005558720 on OpenAlexaff
Filip Wojciechowski, Robert H. E. Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiparallel (mathematics)LinkerPeptide nucleic acidChemistryStereochemistryChirality (physics)NucleobaseTriple helixMonomerTripeptideMoietyPeptideNucleic acid analogueMethyleneNucleic acidRNACombinatorial chemistryDNABiochemistryNucleic acid thermodynamicsOrganic chemistryPolymerGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach to the introduction of chirality into peptide nucleic acid (PNA) by replacement of the methylene carbonyl linker by an alpha-amino acid derived moiety is described. A monomer compatible with Fmoc-based oligomerization chemistry possessing an L-serine derived linker has been synthesized and incorporated into PNA oligomers. A single, central substitution in a hexathymine PNA strongly destabilized triple helix formation whereas a central substitution in a mixed sequence is much better tolerated. We have investigated the influence of this substitution on the selectivity for strand composition (DNA versus RNA complement) and strand orientation (antiparallel versus parallel) in the context of duplex formation. A PNA 11-mer with a single substitution demonstrates a preference for an antiparallel RNA complement, as judged by thermal denaturation analysis of the complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic AcidsSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207