MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005584672 · doi:10.1159/000046905

Interaction of Prostaglandin F<sub>2α</sub> and Prostaglandin-E<sub>2</sub> on Progesterone Production in Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells

2001· article· en· W2005584672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosignals · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuteal phaseProstaglandin EStimulationInternal medicineEndocrinologyProstaglandinProstaglandin fEstrous cycleProstaglandin E2ChemistryHormoneBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the effects of prostaglandin-F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)), prostaglandin-E(2) (PGE(2)) and their interactions on progesterone production in human granulosa-luteal cells (GLCs). Human GLCs collected from in vitro fertilization patients were cultured for 1 (D(1)) or 8 days (D(8)), followed by a 24-hour treatment period, after which media were collected and radioimmunoassayed for progesterone. Seven-point PGF(2alpha) and PGE(2) concentration-response curves were crossed into a matrix of 49 separate treatments. Responses were plotted in three dimensions and as two-dimensional "slices". In D(1) cultured human GLCs neither PGF(2alpha) nor PGE(2) alone had any effect on progesterone production, however two different combinations of these hormones led to at least a 3-fold increase in progesterone production. This stimulation was seen when cells were treated with 10(-6) M PGF(2alpha) plus 10(-9) M PGE(2), and when they were treated with 10(-10) M PGF(2alpha) plus 10(-9) M PGE(2). In D(8) GLCs, PGF(2alpha) stimulated progesterone production maximally at 10(-9) M, while the lowest (10(-11) M) and highest concentrations (10(-6) M) tested were ineffectual. On the contrary, in the presence of high concentrations of PGE(2) (10(-6) to 10(-7) M), PGF(2alpha)-mediated stimulation of progesterone production was attenuated. In a similar fashion to PGF(2alpha), PGE(2) also acted in a luteotrophic manner, although the maximal stimulation of progesterone production was seen at a higher concentration (10(-8) to 10(-7) M). Likewise, PGE(2)-mediated progesterone production was attenuated by the presence of high concentrations of PGF(2alpha) (10(-6) to 10(-7) M). In conclusion, in D(1) human GLCs neither PGF(2alpha) nor PGE(2) alone were luteotrophic, although specific combinations of these hormones were. Conversely, in D(8) GLCs both PGF(2alpha) and PGE(2) stimulated progesterone production in a biphasic manner, while the presence of a high concentration of either of these prostaglandins attenuated the luteotrophic effects of the other. Therefore, PGF(2alpha) and PGE(2) interacted in a concentration-dependent manner, resulting in a multimodal progesterone response, which was easily visualized using three-dimensional plots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it