Metabolic Profiling of Serum Samples by 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Potential Diagnostic Approach for Septic Shock*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics approach can be useful for the early diagnosis and prognosis of septic shock in ICUs. DESIGN: Laboratory-based study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Serum samples from septic shock patients and ICU controls (ICU patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome but not suspected of having an infection) were collected within 24 hours of admittance to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of septic shock and ICU control samples were analyzed and quantified using a targeted profiling approach. By applying multivariate statistical analysis (e.g., orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis), we were able to distinguish the patient groups and detect specific metabolic patterns. Some of the metabolites were found to have a significant impact on the separation between septic shock and control samples. These metabolites could be interpreted in terms of a biological human response to septic shock and they might serve as a biomarker pattern for septic shock in ICUs. Additionally, nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics was evaluated in order to detect metabolic variation between septic shock survivors and nonsurvivors and to predict patient outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an excellent predictive ability for the constructed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis models (septic shock vs ICU controls: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.98; nonsurvivors vs survivors: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolic profiling could be used for diagnosis and mortality prediction of septic shock in the ICU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".