MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Calponin — knocked out but not down!

2000· letter· en· W2005626362 on OpenAlexaff
Michael P. Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2000
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalponinActinCell biologyMyosinGene isoformBiologyCalmodulinVascular smooth muscleCytoskeletonMyofibrilMolecular biologyCellEndocrinologyBiochemistrySmooth muscleGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smooth muscle contraction is regulated primarily by the reversible phosphorylation of myosin II (Somlyo & Somlyo, 1994), but may also be modulated by a thin filament-associated mechanism (Walsh, 1990). Calponin is a candidate for such a modulator (Winder et al. 1998). Calponin was first isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle as a 34 kDa actin- and calmodulin-binding protein (Takahashi et al. 1986) and later shown to exist as multiple isoforms. h1- (α or basic), h2- (neutral) and acidic calponins are the products of three distinct genes; β-calponin is an alternatively spliced variant of h1-calponin. In adult vertebrates, h1-calponin expression is restricted to differentiated smooth muscle cells where it is localized to the contractile and cytoskeletal actin filaments. Although its physiological functions are not clear, h1-calponin has been implicated in the regulation of both contractile and non-contractile functions (adhesion, migration and proliferation). h1-Calponin expression is down-regulated when vascular smooth muscle cells re-enter the cell cycle and proliferate, changing from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype (as occurs in response to vascular injury), and h1-calponin is a useful marker of the contractile phenotype of smooth muscle cells. During embryonic development, this isoform is expressed in other tissues, including the heart, but disappears during late fetal development. h1-Calponin has been implicated in cardiac myofibrillar development and regulation of embryonic heart contraction. Its expression has also been reported in some transformed cells, e.g. osteosarcomas, and a role for the protein in tumour suppression has been proposed. Neutral (h2-) and acidic isoforms of calponin are expressed in smooth muscle and non-muscle cells, but at much lower levels, and less is known about their potential physiological roles. The acidic isoform has been implicated in neurite outgrowth and navigation in the rat and in early embryonic development in Xenopus. β-Calponin has been detected at the protein level only in smooth muscle cells of the urogenital tract. Most work to date has focused on the possibility that h1-calponin regulates smooth muscle contraction via its interaction with actin, as suggested by the inhibition by calponin of the actin-activated myosin MgATPase activity of phosphorylated myosin, the movement of actin filaments over immobilized phosphorylated myosin in the in vitro motility assay, isometric force and shortening velocity in permeabilized smooth muscle strips. These inhibitory effects are alleviated by protein kinase C (PKC)-catalysed phosphorylation of calponin (Winder et al. 1998). A powerful experimental approach to the physiological function of a specific protein is to knock out its gene and observe the resultant phenotype. The h1-calponin knockout mouse was developed by Yoshikawa et al. (1998). They confirmed the absence of h1-calponin and demonstrated that its absence was not compensated for by the over-expression or ectopic expression of other calponin isoforms. Surprisingly, the only obvious phenotypic change was observed in bone, and this initial characterization suggested that h1-calponin acts as a negative regulator of bone formation. Furthermore, h1-calponin is highly expressed in the developing skeleton and in undifferentiated osteoblasts of wild-type mice, consistent with this proposed role. Given the wealth of in vitro data implicating h1-calponin in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction, one might have anticipated that knockout of the h1-calponin gene would have adverse physiological effects on smooth muscle function. In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Matthew et al. (2000) report a very thorough comparison of the contractile properties of bladder and vas deferens smooth muscles of h1-calponin knockout and wild-type mice. The key functional difference is a faster unloaded shortening velocity (Vus) in the knockout mouse, due to a difference in crossbridge cycling. Exogenous calponin reduced Vus of the calponin-negative muscle to that of wild-type. This is consistent with in vitro studies showing a reduction in Vus by addition of exogenous calponin to permeabilized smooth muscle containing the normal complement of calponin (e.g. Obara et al. 1996). As the authors emphasize, these observations are consistent with, but do not unequivocally establish, a physiological role for calponin in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction, presumably by modulating crossbridge interaction kinetics. Intriguingly, Matthew and co-workers also show a reduction in actin content (≈50%) in the calponin knockout mouse. The high Vus in the calponin knockout mouse may therefore be due to the reduction in actin content, resulting in shorter mini-sarcomeres, although it was not possible to determine from morphological studies whether shorter rather than fewer actin filaments are present. Knockout of calponin had no effect on other parameters tested: isometric force, Ca2+ sensitivity of force development or Ca2+ sensitization of contraction by activation of RhoA or PKC pathways. Another intriguing difference between the wild-type and knockout mice involves h-caldesmon, another thin filament-associated protein that has been implicated in the regulation of contraction (Walsh, 1990). The electrophoretic mobility of this smooth muscle-specific isoform is slightly decreased in the calponin knockout mouse. This may reflect a switch to an alternatively spliced variant, although other explanations are also feasible. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to define the basis of this electrophoretic mobility shift, which could conceivably underlie compensation for the lack of h1-calponin expression. Finally, given that the two smooth muscle tissues studied by Matthew and co-workers are phasic smooth muscles, could it be that calponin plays a more important role in the regulation of contraction of tonic smooth muscles?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207