MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005648951 · doi:10.1002/ijch.201100114

Generic Construction of Kraus Operators: <i>d</i>‐level Systems in a Thermal Bosonic Bath

2012· article· en· W2005648951 on OpenAlex
Asoka Biswas, Paul Brumer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsHamiltonian (control theory)Operator (biology)ChemistryRepresentation (politics)Connection (principal bundle)ThermalCoupling (piping)Expression (computer science)Mathematical physicsApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsGeometryMathematical optimizationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dynamical evolution of open systems can be conveniently expressed in the operator sum representation in terms of Kraus operators. Here we introduce an expression for the canonical Kraus representation in terms of the eigenstates |γ〉 and eigenvalues E γ of the total Hamiltonian, thus making a stronger connection to the tools in chemistry. The method is exact, and hence valid for non‐Markovian evolution of the system to all orders of the coupling to the bath. Significantly, it provides a starting point for developing approximate Kraus operators based upon perturbative approximations to |γ〉 and E γ . As an example, the explicit form of these operators is derived for a d ‐level system interacting with a single‐mode thermal bath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it