MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005648951 · doi:10.1002/ijch.201100114

Generic Construction of Kraus Operators: <i>d</i>‐level Systems in a Thermal Bosonic Bath

2012· article· en· W2005648951 on OpenAlexaff
Asoka Biswas, Paul Brumer

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsHamiltonian (control theory)Operator (biology)ChemistryRepresentation (politics)Connection (principal bundle)ThermalCoupling (piping)Expression (computer science)Mathematical physicsApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsGeometryMathematical optimizationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dynamical evolution of open systems can be conveniently expressed in the operator sum representation in terms of Kraus operators. Here we introduce an expression for the canonical Kraus representation in terms of the eigenstates |γ〉 and eigenvalues Eγ of the total Hamiltonian, thus making a stronger connection to the tools in chemistry. The method is exact, and hence valid for non‐Markovian evolution of the system to all orders of the coupling to the bath. Significantly, it provides a starting point for developing approximate Kraus operators based upon perturbative approximations to |γ〉 and Eγ. As an example, the explicit form of these operators is derived for a d‐level system interacting with a single‐mode thermal bath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsrael Journal of ChemistrySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207