MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005653514 · doi:10.1002/prot.20682

Molecular surface generation using a variable‐radius solvent probe

2005· article· en· W2005653514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarRADIUSSolventChemical physicsProtein Data BankSurface (topology)ChemistryMoleculeAccessible surface areaMolecular dynamicsProtein Data Bank (RCSB PDB)Hydrodynamic radiusPolarity (international relations)Atomic radiusProtein structureCrystallographyComputational chemistryGeometryPhysicsPhysical chemistryAqueous solutionStereochemistryMathematicsOrganic chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein-ligand binding occurs through interactions at the molecular surface. Hence, a proper description of this surface is essential to our understanding of the process of molecular recognition. Recent studies have noted the inadequacy of using a fixed 1.4 A solvent probe radius to generate the molecular surface. This assumes that water molecules approach all surface atoms at an equal distance irrespective of polarity, which is not the case. To adequately model the protein-water boundary requires that the solvent probe radius change according to the polarity of its contacting atoms, smaller near polar atoms and larger near apolar atoms. To our knowledge, no method currently exists to generate the molecular surface of a protein in this manner. Using a modification of the marching tetrahedra algorithm, we present a method to generate molecular surfaces using a variable radius solvent probe. The resulting surface lacks many of the unrealistic small crevices in nonpolar regions that are found when utilizing an invariant 1.4 A solvent probe, while maintaining the fine detail of the surface at polar regions. On application of the method on a test set of 20 protein structures taken from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), we also find far fewer empty unsolvated cavities that are present when using only a 1.4 A solvent probe, while the majority of solvated and polar cavities is retained. This suggests that the majority of empty cavities previously observed in protein structures might simply be artifacts of the surfacing method. We also find that the variable probe surface can have significant effects on electrostatic calculations by generating a better tuned description of the protein-water boundary. We also examined the binding interfaces of a diverse set of 55 protein-protein complexes. We find that using a variable probe results in an increase in perceived shape complementarity at these sites compared to using a 1.4 A solvent probe. The molecular volume and surface area are geometric values that determine various important properties for macromolecules, and the altered description afforded by a variable solvent probe molecular surface can have significant implications in protein recognition, energetics, folding, and stability calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it