MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Truncated singular value decomposition for semantic-based data retrieval

2013· article· en· W2005656884 on OpenAlexafffund
Choukri Djellali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsIndexationVector space modelComputer scienceSearch engine indexingWeightingDimension (graph theory)Information retrievalSingular value decompositionAbstractionRepresentation (politics)Explicit semantic analysisVector spaceKnowledge representation and reasoningData miningNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceSemantic computingMathematicsSemantic technologySemantic Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the increasingly encountered challenge of knowledge indexation. In the past decade, research on numerical schemes on knowledge indexation has been quite intensive. Vector space model is only based on the information contained in term weighting and does therefore not process the semantic contained in the sequence in which the words appear in a bag-of-words. This representation provides an abstraction of semantic relations between different linguistic units. A novel semantic-based method for knowledge indexation, which can provide improvement in both indexing and retrieval, is described. Despite a huge dimension in vector space model size, retrieval accuracies are seen to improve significantly when the proposed system is applied for indexing Reuters-21578 corpus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicText and Document Classification TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207